Every job will be affected, some jobs will be created, but every job will be affected: Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang on AI impact
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang emphasized that the real danger is not AI itself, but being left behind by those who learn to use it efficiently.
In an address at the Milken Institute Global Conference 2025, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang presented his stance on artificial intelligence and its future role in employment.
According to a report by Economic Times, he highlighted that, “Every job will be impacted, some jobs will be created, but every job will be impacted.”
He emphasized that the real danger is not AI, but being left behind by those who learn to use it efficiently.
He warned that, “You will not lose your job because of AI, but you will lose your job because of someone who uses AI.”
Jensen Huang on global workforce shortage
Contradicting widespread fears of automation-induced unemployment, Huang spoke about the reality of a global labour shortage. “For the first time in history, we can actually envision an opportunity to bring 30-40 million workers back to the workforce,” he said.
According to him, AI can reduce entry barriers to complex tasks that typically require expertise in coding.
Opposing widespread fears of automation-induced unemployment, Huang spoke about the reality of labour shortages globally. He said, “For the first time in history, we can actually envision an opportunity to bring 30-40 million workers back to the workforce.”
According to him, AI can reduce the entry barrier to complex tasks, which usually require expertise in coding. Talking about “vibe coding”, Huang explained that modern AI tools allow users to interact through sketches, signs, and speech.
He pointed to the power of AI, saying, “AI tools speak the language you want to speak.” He called artificial intelligence the best way to increase global GDP. Huang urged professionals to embrace it instead of opposing it.
He advises users not to be the one who ignores this technology, and let it harm them. Huang’s comments come at a time when concerns of job displacement dominate the debate.
However, recent reports, including one from SEO.AI, indicate that 14% of workers have already experienced AI-related disruptions and the overall impact is less than what was initially feared.
Read more post:
- How Data Centers Created 4.7 million U.S. Jobs—Without Hiring Tech Workers
- At Trump’s $148 million meme coin dinner, ‘the food sucked’ and security was lax, attendee says
- KEA Karnataka KCET Result 2025 Out: Official websites to check result
- How the Federal Reserve is Tackling Economic Uncertainty in 2025
- AI demand alone will require $5.2 trillion in investment-hyperscale data centers
It’s fascinating how Jensen Huang shifts the narrative from fearing AI to embracing its potential. His point about losing jobs not to AI but to those who master it is a wake-up call. The idea of AI reducing barriers to complex tasks could democratize opportunities for millions. However, I wonder how realistic it is to bring 30-40 million workers back into the workforce—what specific industries or roles does he envision for this? The concept of “vibe coding” sounds intriguing, but how accessible is it for people without any technical background? While I agree that AI can boost global GDP, I’m curious about the ethical implications of its widespread adoption. What steps does Huang propose to ensure AI benefits everyone, not just a select few?
It’s fascinating how Jensen Huang shifts the focus from AI being a threat to it being a tool for empowerment. His perspective on job impact feels both realistic and forward-thinking. The idea that AI can reduce barriers to complex tasks is particularly compelling, especially for industries requiring coding expertise. However, I’m curious about how he envisions training the workforce to adapt to these changes efficiently. Do you think companies are truly prepared to upskill their employees at the scale he’s suggesting? While his optimism about global GDP growth through AI is inspiring, I wonder if there’s a risk of widening the skill gap between those who adapt and those who don’t. What’s your take on the concept of “vibe coding” and whether it could democratize tech roles effectively?